JABLUNDER ALLSPIN

What the country needs in a Prime Minister is a manager, not a sweet-talking mangler. Especially in a crisis, which is what New Zealand faced when the Wuhan virus began sweeping the world.

How hard was it to keep it out? New Zealand is surrounded by thousands of kilometres of salt water. We have a bit moat all round us. So all PM Jablunder had to do was make sure the virus could not get past the border.

She failed. After we had all gone through the turmoil and upset of the weeks of lockdown, and were rewarded with zero cases for three months, we then discovered that there were gaping holes in the border-wall--that there was scant testing, that quarantine facilities were hit-and-miss and easily breached--and we were fed lots of sweet talk from the PM and her bureaucratic side-kick in an attempt to fool us back into thinking all was well. It wasn't. The truth is that the Wuhan virus was here to an unknown extent, and spreading. Does Jablunder really think people are so stupid that we cannot see through her (excluding, of course, the die-hard Jablunder-maniacs, who would still think the sun shone out of her if she set off nuclear weapons in kindergartens).

Now, in September 2020, months after the crisis began, we are told that border staff will be tested once a week. But we are also told that that means laboratory testing and that the turnaround five days. So tests only show what the situation was five days earlier. And it takes days for symptoms to show, and all the while an infected person is contagious...

For months the Americans have had a machine made by Abbot Laboratories that produces a result in 5-15 minutes. Jablunder's government should have bought a heap of them, and they should be being used on everyone at the border. Everyone who works there, every day, twice a day, at the start of the shift and the end. And everyone who comes from overseas. And constantly in the quarantine facilities.

And the dumb-as-a-brick, Jablunder-worshipping media should stop using that stupid term 'managed isolation'. It sounds so benign, and thus fools people away from thinking how serious things are. Also stop using the even less threatening, every-more-stupid term MIQ, which is far worse than 'managed isolation.' The word 'quarantine' has been in English for over four hundred years. Use it. (And, by the way, it means forty days--our forebears obviously had far more sense than we have). 

The words we choose and use change our thinking. Especially in a crisis it is vital that we use words that accurately and bluntly tell the truth. It's quarantine. And it should have 'strict' in front of it. No one gets out with reliable testing.

Jablunder failed at every point. So everything she does now is only pretence. Pretending to shut the stable door after horse has bolted. She gives us mime not management: Jablunder Allspin.

Bill English would have managed. He is a farmer, a hands-on, practical man, not a sociologist. He is used to getting down to the back paddock and getting his hands dirty to repair a fence. But he was beaten by the feminazis, who wanted someone to their tastes, someone who said loudly that she would give us 'generational change.' Which means 'social engineering', in feminist form. What damned arrogance! To think that she knows better than centuries of history. Her feet of clay are showing and crumbling.

But the fools who are easily led, the sheeple who follow any nonsense, have given us this outrageous joke.

ABSOLUTE DISCRETION IS EVIL

Long ago there was a King of England who thought he could do as he pleased, that he had absolute discretion. We, the common people, led by fifty barons, taught him in no uncertain terms that he did  not. We sat him down in a field on the edge of the River Thames one summer's day in June 1215 and forced him to affix his royal seal to Magna Carta, which spelt out in detail that he only had the discretion set down and allowed by the rule of law, and nothing else. That was bad King John.

Then in the early seventeenth century another king, King Charles I, thought he had absolute discretion, that he could do as he pleased. We the common people said no, you do not, sign this, the 1627 Petition of Rights. He refused, and went to war against us. We defeated him, and in 1649 chopped off his head. That ended his arrogant thinking.

No one has absolute discretion. And in New Zealand law, there is a vital fragment of Magna Carta, enshrined in the Imperial Laws Application Act 1988, in which Chapter 29 of Magna Carta is featured as the second of our great Constitutional Enactments. It ends with an immutable promise: 'We will not deny or defer, to any man, either justice or right.' Not deny, not even put off.

That, and the other great rights enshrined in the seven general Constitutional Enactments in the Imperial Laws Application Act, set the fundamental limits of power and discretion under our rule of law. Which includes, as the sixth Constitutional Enactment, the 1627 Petition of Rights, and the 1688 Bill of Rights, to which Parliament added in 1990 the New Zealand Bill of Rights which says in section 27 that everyone has the right to the observance of the principles of natural justice, which the Privy Council ruled means fairness writ large.

Therefore no one has absolute discretion, and for Parliament to use that phrase in the Immigration Act 2009 is a gross evil, it is a betrayal of the rule of law, it is a gross betrayal of the fundamental rights and freedoms of the people.

In everyday speech that phrase means what it says: you can decide what you please, and no one may gainsay you, you are answerable only to yourself.

It is no relief to the evil that Parliament did the country in using it to point out that its definition in section 11 of the Immigration Act, to paraphrase it, only means that in that Act something cannot be applied for, that the decision-maker decides independent of any application. For that is doubly iniquitous, because the law should be understandable, it should use English as we all understand it, it should not used it in a way that means something different to common usage, because what will then happen is what happened in the Sroubek case--that people, including officials and the Minister and the media, will take the common meaning, and think that the decision-maker can decide what he pleases.

That phrase should be expunged from law. It militates against over eight centuries of fundamental rights and freedoms. It wars against the people.

For the Department of Immigration, that is only one of the long catalogue of evils that lie at its door.

THE MANIFOLD SINS OF INZ

THE MANIFOLD SINS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF IMMIGRATION: THE SINS OF INZ

This 55-page paper, written after three years of wide-ranging experience and searching analysis, shows point-by-point with considerable evidence the chronic egregious wrongdoings of New Zealand's Department of Immigration, the entity that stands at the door of the country. Its arrogant sins of omission and commission range from blatantly lying to foreigners and lying about them, to manipulating statutes and rules to suit its bureaucratic wickedness, to ignoring the great founding principles of justice and law, to being guilty of misdirecting/misspending vast sums of public money.

It is years past the time that this evil entity was brought to the heel of truth and good law, purged of its rottenness from top to bottom, and thus remade into an organisation that represents New Zealanders as they truly want to be seen--an organisation that they can be proud of, not one that keeps manifesting bureaucratic thuggery all over the world.

('Thug' was originally a Hindi word, meaning 'deceiver'. The bureaucratic thugs in the Department of Immigration deceive themselves, they deceive the state because they do not serve it, they deceive foreigners with presumptuous exercises of power that they do not possess.)

Here is the URL of the paper to copy and paste in case clicking on the link fails to work:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Xvz_kXF71vVPD_If9VIGGiixx2lLwXDO

Now that the case of the Czech criminal has avalanched across the news, the fact that the Department has been conning Ministers of Immigration for years is biting them back, and hard. They deserve everything they get; they are the authors of their own discomfiture. The poor Minister is getting it in the neck, but it is the bureaucrats in the Department that are to blame. They are the ones who should be sacked, not him.

MAL-SPEAK

So the new Speaker, Trevor Mallard, thinks he has the unilateral right to cut God and Jesus Christ and the Queen out of Parliament by cutting them out of the prayer that has righteously and righfully opened each Sitting Day for many decades.

He is wrong. Was that an election-plank? Did people vote for that? Does he have permission from anyone but himself for that? No, no, no. Did he make that change for truth? No.

First, he is a hyprocrite. In his oaths of office he has sworn allegiance to New Zealand's Head of State, Queen Elizabeth the Second. Now he cuts her out of Parliament.

Second, he is a fool. Any nation that ceases to honour God and his Son will suffer the consequences. Turning our backs on the Creator of all things, pretending he does not exist, is as blind and stupid as pretending that the sun does not shine.

Third, he is not the people, he is only one person. In doing what he has done he is guilty of the abuse of rank, so he has revealed himself as is yet another of the grey hordes guilty of that corruption. He is meant to be a public servant; he is not master of anything.

It is not for him to make his will or opinion ride rough-shod over the wisdom of our forebears or the will of a  very large number of New Zealanders who want to see this country keep the faith, and who sing sincerely our national prayer: 'God of nations at thy feet, in the bonds of love we meet; hear our voices we entreat--God defend New Zealand....'

Malignant Mallard cannot expect God to defend New Zealand if its Parliament does not defend God.

JOHN KEY IS A CRIMINAL

What John Key did to that waitress is a crime. It is common assault under both the Summary Offences Act 1981 and the Crimes Act 1961. So lying prat's true nature has been revealed. By him. He is a thug: a thug against the truth, a thug against what Churchill called 'the folk who toil and moil', a thug against anything and anyone that does not fit his tiny mind or his love of money or his mates who have the same characteristics.

This is yet another in the avalanche of reports and videos (this one showing him doing it in a street) in the saga of 'pin the ponytail on the JohnKey', while the PM--aka Ponytail Manipulator or Puller Man--makes an ass of himself by laughing off his assaults as just a bit of fun, despite New Zealand law classifying them all as common assault. What pulling power will he have at the polls now? And why does he always pick on females?

CORRUPT COPS NO SURPRISE

So some cops have been caught lying in court to get a conviction. The surprise is that so few are ever put under investigation. But the focus in the cop shops is always on getting the result they want, and 'evidence' is whatever you make it to get that result. In this case they were caught  with their panties on the floor by the camera in their taser, and therefore there could be no continuation of their perjury. Usually they can carry on colluding in their lies to hammer any protest into oblivion. Even worse, in this case, the Assistant Police Commissioner says the reasons why they might have done that are 'endless.' That shows how corrupt his thinking is. There is no reason for lying in court.

Get honest police officers, not lying cops.

LYING JOURNALISTS

I am sick to the core of screaming headlines not connected with the stories below them, screaming-out stories not connected with reality, screaming-out words that have no connection with a good English dictionary and have been divorced from their true meanings. I am sick to the core of a plethora of dishonest journalists screaming for attention rather than focusing intently on conveying the truth to the public without colouring, without activist bias, without deviation and dictatorial perversion.

Bluntly, they are liars.

They are small-minded prats; nothing but legends in their own lynchtimes.

They are liars who live in yesterday, because they are overlooking the fact that thanks to the Internet we can easily discover what knaves they are.

The other extreme--good journalists--are honest, passionate about the truth, they are the fourth estate not a rabid fifth column, they serve their country conscientiously, they are linguistic craftsmen and their use of English is a joy to read; they never try to ram their opinions down your throat, they are never manipulative. The liar are the opposite.

TRUTH WILL OUT

'Truth will out' is an old saying and a true one. NewZealand has just seen more proof of it. A door set high and proud, a door with magnificent promise, a door with a polished, well-crafted veneer was hacked through--to reveal a great pile of rotten wood artfully stacked on muck. When the rotten heap was kicked into the open a big fat slater, notable for being a legend in its own lynchtime, reared up on its cloven hooves, hissed at the world and scuttled for invented cover; then a crushing heel kicked back hard, but only exposed yet more warts; then the key to the promissory door fell into the muck, and we saw that its bright shiny chrome was nothing but dripping slime and deep rust. It was no key, it was no radar, it was no compass; it could never open a worthy door or find its way to one.

An honest Prime Minister confronted with the allegations made in Dirty Politics would instantly have said, 'I will order a thorough investigation, and if what my staff and ministers are accused of is shown to be true they will be sacked.' But he did not do that. Instead he attacked the messenger over and over and over again, at the same time as admitting that he had not read the message, but still asserting that it was nothing but smear. And when a journalist asked him why emails sent to newspapers were discoverable under the Official Information Act but not ones sent to bloggers, instead of replying, 'We want to be open, we want to show you that we have nothing untoward to hide, and therefore we will release to you whatever you ask for,' he shut the questioner down by saying repeatedly, 'We observe the law'--meaning that the Act does not cover bloggers so there's nothing in law that makes openness obligatory (from 02:15 on this video). His guilty guns are smoking like overwrought volcanoes and his counterattack guns are spiked. He has a lot to answer for but is answering none of it.

As the Southland Times remarked, 'If those persistently high polls have been giving the impression that John Key can walk on water, the first post-Hager poll will show whether he can walk on sewage.'

Key's strident ploy on the 18th of August defied the smallest semblance of credibility was to say that Hager's claims are dissolving before his eyes. That was the same day that the original emails were being released, and which proved the claims were rock-solid. The Prime Minister obviously does not know the difference between solidity and dissolution.

Then his arrogantly asserted 'solidity' began to dissolve.

THE PLAGUE OF OUR TIME

Shakespeare perfectly summed up the present time in King Lear (Act 4, Scene 1):

'Tis the times' plague, when madmen lead the blind.

BUREAUCRATS AND PUBLIC SERVANTS

Bureaucrats are self-serving, they do not care about people, they use dubious process to beat them. Public servants serve their community faithfully and well, they care about people, they use due process to help them.

Politicians are bureaucrats who make speeches. Statesmen are public servants who make speeches.

SHELL-SHOCK KILLS

Oh, goody, goody, goody! Shell has announced that it will be spending $200 million drilling a test-well to look for natural gas in the Great South Basin--thus prolonging our murderous addiction to messing up the planet by burning folly fuels (read 'the only planet we can live on in the entire universe').

It would be far better and infinitely wiser to spend that amount on switching the country to sustainable fuels, such as solar power and fuel-cells (batteries that run on hydrogen, made by splitting water with sunlight). We could build thousands of fuel-cell cars, switch tens of thousands of homes to solar power, and be changing the world for the better...

But why let sense get in the way of blind addiction? Why let reality get in the way of anachronistic corporate greed? Why let wisdom get in the way of infernal stupidity? So why not let the grubbymint of Enzed carry on selling drilling licences to shell-shocked madmen?

After all, the consequence will only be a few million deaths caused by climate-change and pollution. Or, if they are really lucky, a few billion. What a bite-'em line that will be!

UNFORTUNATE RHYMES AND BREEDING

Len Brown
Pants Down
Tup Town

It sounds like horse-breeding: TupTown out of SuperCity by PantsDown.

LANGWEDGE

There is language and langwedge. Language is talking to people or with them. Talking to them is good; talking with them is best. Making wedges between them is bad. Driving foul wedges into them is worst.

Talking with people not only strives to communicate--to be heard and listened to and understood--it also strives to please. It strives to use language in a way that gives pleasure, and therefore uses it with care, and
thus shows that the speaker cares about the listener.

That is the heights. The worst depths are what Tolkien called Black Speech. English is the greatest language that has ever existed on Earth. It has hundreds of thousands of good words. Filling one's mouth and other people's ears with constant repetitions of a few foul ones says to the hearers, 'I care nothing for you, you are only a toilet, I want to fill you with verbal sewage. You are only worth being psychologically abused, I am the one to do it, and I shall do it. For I am superior to you, I am worth more than you, I have the right to make a toilet of you, I have the right to violate you with my excrement, and you have no right to deny me.'

It is regrettable that although using such language in or within hearing of a public place has long been illegal in New Zealand, it is a law hardly ever invoked, and that the abuse remains rampant. Most of it is psychological sexual abuse, because the words are black words for the parts of our bodies that make us male and female and and mark us such. Denigrating them in the most vile way is the same under the heading of gender as calling an African a nigger under the heading of race. 'Nigger' is psychological racial abuse; four-letter words are psychological sexual abuse.

Unfortunately most of that abuse is hurled at men. Even the word that on the surface applies only to women is usually used of men by men; for it is the ultimate abuse: it says that a man does not have the mark of manhood. When used of a woman it says that that is all she is, that it is has only the value of abuse, and that she should be treated accordingly.

'Those to whom evil is done do evil in return.' Small wonder that there is so much retaliatory abuse in visual and physical forms.

ROAST-BUSTERS NEW ZEALAND

Although, rightly, there has been an outcry against the wicked, sexually-abusive boys who call themselves Roast-Busters, their existence should surprise no one, because sexual abuse is deeply entrenched in New Zealand. Many, perhaps most, of those who are condemning them are guilty of it every day and all day.

For a start, sexually-abusive language is part of their speech. They might be able to see that calling a black man a nigger is racial abuse, but they cannot see that using the so-called four-letter words is sexual abuse. For them that vile form of speech is so normal that they have rendered themselves incapable of hearing what it really is. The Roast-Busters are only expressing physically what most people are constantly expressing verbally.

Even when their language is not drenched in four-letter words they speak and act in ways that manifest an abusive attitude to the human body, in particular to the parts that are the emblems and the very essence of manhood and boyhood, girlhood and womanhood. They mock them, they belittle them, they denigrate them, they regard them as a filthy joke, they think of them as filthy and treat them as filthy, they use the vile words that mean them to hurl abuse at anything they loathe. Then they wonder why people treat men and women badly. They do it in speech all the time, so they should not be surprised when so many do it in practice, and that a few openly boast about it on Facebook. That same boasting is part of their speech and their thinking.

Worse, many, perhaps most nowadays, are not bothered by, indeed practise as a 'normal' part of their daily lives casual sex, flitting from bed to bed, temporary sexual liasons, practices that dishonour their bodies, or to use precise English: fornication, adultery, sodomy, etc. In daily practice they are reducing what should only be one of the finest aspects of humanity--the expression of true love--to careless gratification, to superficial entertainment, to abuse of others, to abuse of self.

'Abuse' is bad usage. Sexual abuse is bad usage--physical bad usage and verbal bad usage--of the parts of the body that make us and mark us as male and female. Everyone who manifests any form of abuse toward them is part of Roast-Busters Incorporated. In short, part of everyday New Zealand.

TUNNEL VISION

What would Sigmund Freud have to say about Len Brown's obsession with underground tunnels?

THIEVES OF LIFE

There is no replay button in life. We live each second, each minute, each hour, each day, each week, each month, each year only once. Once. Therefore the people who 'design' systems that waste people's time are stealing part of their lives. I am weary of systems designed by bureaucratic prats who cannot design their way out a wet paper bag, even with the help of nuclear weapons, and a squadron of bulldozers. Their bad systems waste time. They are thieves of life.

It is the corruption of incompetence, the corruption carelessness, the corruption of overweening vanity and the inability to admit shortcomings, it is the corruption of stupidity, it is the corruption of appointing second- and third-rate people to jobs that need first-rate performance.

BOTULISM IN THE PIPE

Fonterra's discovery and admission that tonnes of its products were contaminated by the bacteria that causes botulism, due to a dirty pipe in one of its factories, is a perfect metaphor for the undeniable fact that the '100% pure' and 'one of the least corrupt countries in the world' labels are lies. The truth is that there are dirty pipes oozing the botulism of corruption all over the place in New Zealand.

Even though the bacterium turned out to be another, similar one, because the testing had not differentiated them as it should have, the point, like the dirty pipe, remains. Indeed it is underlined by the fact that the initial tests did not know the difference between great harm and harmless, that the lab that did them did not have the necessary accreditation, and that the Hautapu factory had to closed down and cleansed before normal production could resume.

The New Zealand system is riddled with multiple watchdogs who have the same incompetence. For example, we have a plethora of incompetent judges (and cops), but the judicial watchdog, the Judicial Conduct Commission, is incompetent and grossly biased in favour of those he is meant to be exposing. Incompetence set to watch for incompetence is a species of corruption.

There are two kinds of corruption. Deliberate and accidental. But at base it is all the same. It is vanity. It can be the love of titles, seats of honour, official baubles--the corruption of greedy pomposity. It can be a taste for personal power--the corruption of overweening self-importance. It can be acting for a friend or someone with a title instead of democratic law--the corruption of influence. It can be making a decision for bureaucratic convenience, not true public service--the corruption of process over humanity. It can be not bothering to do your job properly--the corruption of irresponsible carelessness. It can be not bothering to do the job at all--the corruption of laziness and pretence. It can be not being up to the job--the corruption of incompetence. It can be the corruption of appointing people to positions for the wrong reasons, positions for which they do not have the ability or are disqualified by psychological shortcomings or psychopathic tendencies--the corruption of positions. It can be not bothering with the law or researching the facts--the corruption of wilful lawlessness and ignorance. It can refusing to admit a mistake in the face of the facts and the law--the corruption of wilful blindness. It can be not understanding simple words--the corruption of ignorant stupidity. It can be forcing people to comply with your dictates to satisfy pride, bureaucratic arrogance, or sloth--the corruption of petty oppression. It can be refusing to give a straight answer to a valid question--the corruption of the silent lie. It can be presenting false or misleading information and pretending it is true, or falsifying the law and the meaning of words--the corruption of outright lies, of deliberate evil. It can be offering a position for a vote or a wad of money˜the corruption of bribery. It can be acting out of hatred, malice or the desire for revenge--the corruption of wanting to do harm. It can be acting on shonky official advice--the corruption of careless and uninformed decisions. It can be political interference in due process, such as misusing a statutory authority--the corruption of abusing political position. It can be conducting a hearing with a closed mind, with the verdict politically dictated in advance--the corruption of prejudice. It can be unfairness--the corruption of denying natural justice, which we all have the right to under the Bill of Rights Act.

HYPOCRISY, EVIL AND PUNISHMENT

This hypocritical, godless nation, sings 'God defend New Zealand', then does not believe that God exists, thumbs its nose at him, mocks him and rejects him. This hypocritical, godless nation is presided over by the most corrupt Parliament in its history. This hyprocritical, godless nation, has rejected God and his love, and therefore has chosen his wrath.

New Zealand should therefore not be surprised that a city called Christchurch, a city named after the Son of God and his church, was firstly shaken hard. But it ignored the warning, it even held a 'religious service' to which every godless, idolatrous, false, Satanic 'religion' was invited. It failed to worship God alone, it failed to give him alone the glory, it failed to slough off its foul idolatry and hypocrisy. Even weak and foolish churches joined in that godless 'service', although they know that lukewarmness and hyprocrisy are loathed by God and condemned by him and will bring punishment.

Therefore the hard warning shake in which no one died was followed by a much harder one that flattened the city, killed people, and reduced its godless cathedral to ruin. Its pride was in the building, not in the reason for it. Its pride was reduced to rubble.

But, heedless of those warnings, this foolish, godless nation then began to pass a law that would call homosexuality equal to marriage. The dictionary cannot stomach that, thousands of years of history cannot stomach that, logic cannot stomach that, mathematics cannot stomach that. Marriage is the physical, sexual, mental, emotional and spiritual joining of a man and a woman, ordained by God, and it cannot be anything else, no matter what hordes of godless fools might say in defiance. Even kindergarten mathematics says that an apple and an orange is not equal to two apples or two oranges, yet this godless, illogical nation said it could define a word as anything it pleased.

It cannot. God will not accept that evil. So he delivered a severe warning against that by visiting upon this nation the worst drought we have had for seventy years. But he was mocked, in Parliament, by a foolish godless man who does not know what a rainbow is and what it means, or care, and thus he mocked God Almighty.

So then Wellington was given a warning, on a Sunday, on the Lord's Day. A hard, sharp warning. And the building called Public Trust was badly damaged, as were the upper floors of the Bank of New Zealand building. Two idols were singled out: trusting in public opinion and trusting in the worship of money.

Yet still this godless, hypocritical nation ignores God, ignores his love, ignores the truth, worships gods of its own imaginings. It ignores the fact that Sodom and Gomorrah were destroyed for the evils that it now calls good, in law.

The Bible says God is not mocked (Galatians 6:7), and that we reap what we sow, and it warns again and again that when a nation turns against him it will be punished. God will punish it. He will turn nature against it till it repents of its evil and turns back to him.

God loves us and wants the best for us. Satan hates us and wants the worst. When we reject the love of God we choose the hatred of Satan, and by aligning ourselves with Satan we make ourselves enemies of God. When we reject God's love we have chosen his wrath, and we must accept the consequences.

NZ MORE CORRUPT GLOBAL SURVEY FINDS

'Corruption and bribery are perceived to be getting worse in many countries, and trust in governments is falling worldwide, according to a survey by the group Transparency International.'

''The Global Corruption Barometer 2013 paints a bleak picture. One in every four people paid a bribe in the last 12 months when accessing public institutions and services, according to Transparency International's report.'

New Zealand, along with most other countries, is perceived by the majority of its citizens as being more corrupt than it was.

Shall we act surprised? We have the most corrupt Parliament in New Zealand's history, we have officials being prosecuted for criminal and losing standards-accreditation, we have a steady stream of 'businessmen' (read crooks) being found guilty of fraud and stealing millions, we have cheats and liars, rogues and knaves, thieves, abusers and murderers and  oozing out of the rotten woodwork everywhere we look.

HYPER-CORRUPTION ON STEROIDS

This careless arrogant corruption, riding roughshod over any semblance of the rule of law and human rights, deserves to be condemned before the whole world. The Supreme Court made a judgement in accordance with law and human rights, the government didn't like it, so it rammed 'legislation' through to trash it, and trashed the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act along with it. More corruption from the most corrupt Parliament in New Zealand's history--a most unrepresentative House of Representatives.

Serious concerns over carer's legislation

Backlash grows over disabled carers bill